In short, Treisman found that black students were trying very hard to succeed, but were “trying to do it all by themselves” in a field where “pooling intellectual resources” was key. Steele includes many details about his life experiences, beginning with the true realization of. In his new book, Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us, social psychologist Claude Steele helps us find answers to these questions. Throughout the book, he describes the research he’s done on stereotyping, and the surprising, sometime counterintuitive conclusions he’s drawn about human nature and human behavior. They also didn’t talk as much about their academics, which made them less likely to realize that they weren’t the only ones struggling with the material, and more likely to question whether they belonged in the class (or even the college-one student whose story Steele shares dropped out of Berkeley altogether). Claude Steele is the author and narrator of Whistling Vivaldi. It takes its unusual name from a story told to the author by Brent Staples, an African-American journalist who writes for The New York Times. Black students were the most independent in their study habits, however-they studied for longer and made a point of isolating themselves when they worked. Whistling Vivaldi is a summary of Steele’s groundbreaking research on group identity and the ways in which stereotypes can undermine the performance of the people they target. He found that white students studied more independently, and focused less of their social lives on academics, than Asian students, who helped each other and studied together. Years before, Treisman studied the way different racial groups learn mathematics. In other words, the second scenario was proved resoundingly correct.The mathematician Philip Uri Treisman has developed workshops designed to help students overcome stereotypes. He sometimes felt as if he didn’t belong in the program at alla thought that occurs to. He was also the only black student in his program, and as a result, he had an extra layer of concern. Like every other graduate student, he was very intimidated. I paused for a few seconds after I finished reading the sentence that said, I don’t know what being black meant, but I was getting the idea that it was a big deal (2). In 1967, Steele began graduate school in social psychology at Ohio State University. They found that stereotyped students who went through the program went on to get better grades than non-stereotyped students with equal test scores. Whistling Vivaldi: Chapter Summary In chapter one to three of Whistling Vivaldi, the author started the book with his memory of recognizing his given social identity. With strong evidence showing that the problem involves more than weaker skills, Steele explores other explanations. ![]() Steele addresses one of the most perplexing social issues of our time: the trend of minority underperformance in higher education. Their extensive study measured minority students’ SAT scores, put some of these students through an intervention program designed to reduce the influence of stereotypes, and then measured the students’ college grades. Summary: 'In Whistling Vivaldi, social psychologist Claude M. Walton and Spencer hypothesized that the second scenario was the correct one. In both scenarios the student underperforms on the SAT but still gets into college, but then goes on to further underperform in college-the difference is that the cause of the first scenario is lack of motivation or work ethic, and the second is caused by compounding identity threats. ![]() Greg Walton and Steve Spencer returned to Steele's original question of why minorities underperform academically, and synthesized all this research into a choice between two hypothetical scenarios: both involving a black student taking the SAT, applying for college, and going through college.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |